Pages

Showing posts with label webmaster world. Show all posts
Showing posts with label webmaster world. Show all posts

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Poll: Penalize The SEO Agency For Strategies Applied To Clients?



Last week, we covered how Google banned the agency who applied positive tactics that are against Google's webmaster guidelines. Although, as we sharp out later, this is not the first time Google took this way, it is the first time they did so in this nature.

A perceived white hat SEO agency, does link building and offers money for links for their clients. The SEO agency is outed and just later, Google bans the agency, their associates and maybe some of their clients.

Is it right for Google to take action on the SEO agency assuming the agency did not use those same tactics on their own site. Again, lets pretend (although I don't recognize if it is true) that this agency did not buy a single link for their own web site - they only did it for clients - should Google penalize the agency for the tactics they deploy on their client sites?

Some may argue it depends on if the SEO agency was see-through about the dangers to their clients. Some may say, it doesn't matter - the agency did it, they should be insistant about not using systems outside of Google's guidelines.



Webmasters Feel Unhappy By Google Shopping Move To Paid Placement


Google announced great news, they are responsibility away with Google Product Search and swapping it with Google Shopping. The name modification isn't a great deal but the model is, they are successful from a free product search engine to a paid one!


Danny Sullivan said this is the leading period Google is removing a free product to a paid product. And it is upsetting webmasters and SEOs in the forums. I recommend you read Danny's article for perspective before I share the response by SEOs and webmasters in the forums.


Before I do that, so you know, this feature was first named Froogle, then named Google Products, then named Google Base, then Google Merchants, then Google Product Search and now Google Shopping (although it might have been named shopping also for a period of time).


Anyway, here is some of the response after WebmasterWorld and Cre8asite Forums.


Great, now they're going to charge for approximately that has been free for a very long time. Not that it really performed that well anyway.


Now repeat me, why do we all just give Google our content to monetize for free? Google has no content without ours.


Google has, for years now, been consistently developing and promoting their own services to the frequent detriment of prior service partners and query return breadth. This is another logical revenue step... albeit one that Google, also for years, was at pains to label 'evil'. The humourous part of this are Google's attempts to deflect, even redefine, pay for inclusion: such behaviour simply underlines that they know they have finally closed the door on their business 'otherness'. The emperor has no clothes. The sooner Google-centric webdevs acknowledge this and undertake a realistic reassessment of their business model the longer they may stay in business.



Saturday, May 26, 2012

Official: Search engines Penguin 1.1 Now Stay

For the last few several weeks, we have been confirming on rumours in the boards that Search engines launched a Panda renew. The Penguin 1.1 upgrade is now formally live.

All of those risky content were down right incorrect, according to Search engines. But Google Matt Cutts has tweeted that a Penguin upgrade is now live - when many of you have been awaiting.
 
Minor weather report:: We encouraged 1st Penguin una cosa information renew an time ago. Impacts <0.1% of British looks.

Personally, I think all those periods we revealed on Penguin up-dates - I think those were live assessments of what we see now. I think Search engines was examining this and some website owners grabbed that their websites either retrieved or recently hit. Of course, there are many who were under the bogus knowing that they were hit by Penguin. But for the most aspect, I believe these were live assessments. I can quickly be incorrect.

Those up-dates were on or about May 13th, May 15th and yesterday on May 24th.

So now we have it - I wish those who were hit by the original Penguin update on Apr Twenty fourth has retrieved.


Friday, May 25, 2012

Evaluate Your AdWords Efficiency With Competitors: Market Insights

This weeks time, Search engines presented a new AdWords review known as Market Ideas. The review gives you a glimp into how well you are doing for a particular look for term when in comparison to your competition.

The review contains the following fields:
Average position

Average place is a fast way to evaluate how high your ads are position in contrast to those of other promoters competitive in the same sales. Regular place is the normal position of the ad in the sales, which decides the order of the ads on the look for google.

Impression share


Impression discuss is the amount of opinions you obtained separated by the approximated number of opinions you were qualified to obtain. Qualifications is based on your present ads' focusing on configurations, acceptance statuses, offers, and Quality Ratings. In the Market insights review, impact discuss also lets you know the impact discuss of other promoters as a amount of the sales in which you were also competitive.

Overlap rate

Overlap amount lets you know how often you and another merchant obtained opinions at the same time for this look for term.

Position above rate


Position above amount lets you know how often another participant's ad was proven in an increased place that yours was in sales in which you both obtained opinions.

Top of site rate

This figure lets you know how often your ad (or the ad of another merchant, based on which row you are viewing) was proven at the top of the site, above the natural look for.

Here is a display taken that you can enlarge:





You can accessibility it on the search term stage by hitting the symbol on the remaining of the search term and then on the "activity report" option:

Auction Insights
For more details, see this help page.

New Search engines Penguin Upgrade Rumors: Penguin 1.1

Tedster, the manager at WebmasterWorld, began a line at WebmasterWorld asking if others think Search engines encouraged out or is forcing out an upgrade to the Penguin algorithm.

He considers they are due to the improve in conversation in the various message board strings of individuals declaring recoveries and also new individuals declaring they were hit. That is the same measurement we use to identify and review on possible Search engines up-dates - but now, I am stating Tedster.

We believed we saw Penguin up-dates before, once around  May 13th and then again around May 15th but Search engines said no, it wasn't Penguin, Panda or anything else.

Is this the actual Penguin update? Is this edition 1.1 of Penguin?

I do not know - did you recover?